1 BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 2 450 N STREET 3 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT 9 MAY 25, 2016 10 11 12 13 14 CHIEF COUNSEL MATTERS 15 J RULEMAKING 16 J1 READOPTION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO 17 DIESEL FUEL TAX REGULATION 1432, OTHER NONTAXABLE 18 USES OF DIESEL FUEL IN A MOTOR VEHICLE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 REPORTED BY: Kathleen Skidgel 28 CSR NO. 9039 1 1 P R E S E N T 2 3 For the Board of Equalization: Fiona Ma, CPA 4 Chairwoman 5 Diane L. Harkey Vice Chair 6 Jerome E. Horton 7 Member 8 Sen. George Runner (Ret.) Member 9 Yvette Stowers 10 Appearing for Betty T. Yee, State Controller 11 (per Government Code Section 7.9) 12 Joann Richmond 13 Chief Board Proceedings 14 Division 15 For Board of Equalization Staff: Kevin Smith 16 Tax Counsel III Legal Department 17 Bradley Heller 18 Tax Counsel IV Legal Department 19 20 ---oOo--- 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 450 N STREET 2 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 3 MAY 25, 2016 4 ---oOo--- 5 MS. MA: Ms. Richmond, please introduce our 6 next item. 7 MS. RICHMOND: Our next item this morning 8 are our Chief Counsel matters. Item J Rulemaking. 9 J1 Readoption of Proposed Amendment to Diesel Fuel 10 Tax Regulation 1432, Other Nontaxable Uses of Diesel 11 Fuel in a Motor Vehicle. 12 MS. MA: Okay, welcome. To the Department, 13 please introduce yourselves and begin your 14 presentation. 15 MR. SMITH: Good morning, Chairwoman Ma and 16 Members of the Board. I'm Kevin Smith from the 17 Board's Legal Department. With me today is Bradley 18 Heller, also from the Board's Legal Department. 19 We are here today to request that the Board 20 vote to readopt the proposed amendments to Diesel 21 Fuel Tax Regulation 1432, Other Nontaxable Uses of 22 Diesel Fuel in a Motor Vehicle. 23 In December 2015, the Board adopted the 24 amendments and submitted the rulemaking file to the 25 Office of Administrative Law. However, during OAL's 26 review of the rulemaking file, OAL staff concluded 27 that Board staff's reference to data from other 28 states and internal data in the initial statement of 3 1 reasons did not provide a sufficient factual basis 2 to support the safe-harbor percentages contained in 3 the proposed amendments. 4 Therefore, staff has addressed OAL's 5 concerns by adding documents containing the data 6 from other states and internal data to the 7 rulemaking file and providing interested parties 8 with an additional opportunity to comment on the new 9 documents. 10 Staff has not received any comments 11 regarding the new documents and staff has not made 12 any changes to the amendments the Board adopted in 13 December 2015. 14 Thank you. 15 MS. MA: Okay. Thank you. 16 Members, any comments? Questions? 17 MR. RUNNER: Move adoption. We'll try it 18 again. 19 MS. HARKEY: Second. 20 MS. MA: Okay. Mr. Runner moves, Ms. 21 Harkey seconds, to adopt staff recommendation. 22 Without objection, motion carries. 23 MR. SMITH: Thank you. 24 ---oOo--- 25 26 27 28 4 1 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE 2 3 State of California ) 4 ) ss 5 County of Sacramento ) 6 7 I, Kathleen Skidgel, Hearing Reporter for 8 the California State Board of Equalization certify 9 that on May 25, 2016 I recorded verbatim, in 10 shorthand, to the best of my ability, the 11 proceedings in the above-entitled hearing; that I 12 transcribed the shorthand writing into typewriting; 13 and that the preceding pages 1 through 4 constitute 14 a complete and accurate transcription of the 15 shorthand writing. 16 17 Dated: May 31, 2016 18 19 20 ____________________________ 21 KATHLEEN SKIDGEL, CSR #9039 22 Hearing Reporter 23 24 25 26 27 28 5